| |
Some frequently asked questions: |
| |
Why would it be better to contract with
one company to rollout a program instead of seeking out contractors
and bidding it out locally? |
| |
|
| |
|
There are many benefits to consolidating
projects with one or two contactors for program rollouts. Below are
just a few of the reasons. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Reduced Costs Through Economies Of Scale
- Lets face it, the most motivator for consolidating work with a contractor
is to reduce cost. Consolidating to a few or one contractor allows
one to better leverage the learning curve encountered on the first
few sites and transfer the knowledge and efficiencies gained to other
crews and sites installed. In addition, the project management and
support personnel also will benefit from the learning curve and will
achieve similar improvements in efficiency as the project progresses.
Experience has shown that these efficiencies result in prices lower
than what would be offered by local contractors that only have the
opportunity to benefits from doing a few sites. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Greater Consistency, Improved Quality, Less Disruption
- By consolidating more work into fewer contractors, the lessons learned
in the early phases of a rollout can result in smoother sailing as
the project matures. This can be especially beneficial to the occupants
of the facilities because they will benefit from having the work performed
by "battle tested veterans" which greatly minimizes the
potential for unnecessary disruptions to the facilities. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Reduce Internal Resources Required For Implementation
- Soliciting responses from and managing fewer contractors means that
fewer internal resources are required to oversee the project implementation
phase. Furthermore, companies such as NES can also perform a vital
role by coordinating all schedules directly with the facility managers
which in and of itself is a major task that internal resources are
often burdened with. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|